Educational Evaluation For Special Education Student With Autism

It has a full evaluation every three years to determine eligibility for special education services are required by law to all students of special education. Is about student named "Adam" in the case study below. Adam is 7 years old, I have autism. He has become the setting of the class of special day in public schools. In the case study, details of educational evaluation of three years of Adam is included.

Students in this case study, has autism. His name is Adam. Adam is seven years old. He is a class of special day for severely disabled students. The evaluation of three years of Adam, had to be completed to determine eligibility for special education services for him. Adam, have parents who are involved in the education of his violently with advocate. When it is presented to the parents, functional analysis, they were asked, including the evaluation of assistive technology and occupational therapy, the evaluation of additional assessment plan. Given to the appropriate specialist a copy of the signed assessment plan: a special education teacher psychologist, occupational therapist, speech therapist, speech therapist, and nurse.

Before you can manage (PEP-R) psychoeducational profile revised, school psychologists have observed Adam on several occasions. PEP-R, covers the different areas of development. Test item is a non-language most of the respondents expected a simple, and specific instructions, but it can be found. Imitation, perception, fine motor, gross motor, integration of eye-hand, PEP-R provides information on the development work in the field and cognitive verbal cognitive ability. PEP-R is composed of a set of learning materials and toys that have been presented to Adam in the activity of play that has been structured. Psychologist, was recorded the response of Adam to the test. His score was distributed in four areas of action and then 7 development. Result profiles revealed strengths and weaknesses of Adam in various fields of development and behavior.

Portfolio of Adam, was used as an evaluation tool. It is included in his portfolio there was a note sample work, progress reports, behavior reports, and daily reports from parents. The teacher sent a daily report that was included performance goals / benchmarks and challenges of home Adam, the level of compliance and prompt. His parents signed, and return on a daily basis, is now part of his portfolio. Daily was used to aid the evaluation of Adam.

The psychologist of the school, Adam was analyzed functional in order to determine why that is exhibited disruptive behavior. Was sent home for parents to complete the questionnaire. Cam and Screaming was the action that parents and teachers were concerned. Was responsible for collecting behavior data on teacher classroom. I have created a data collection form teacher and psychologist. Teacher, recorded the occurrence of undesirable behavior. Compiled by the psychologist, the report has been written information from the teacher observation and parent, the psychologist.

Evaluate him, occupational therapist that was observed Adam wrote the report. The school nurse were tested Adam with a special device. She was able to determine that it seemed his hearing to normal. Parents of Adam does not have to report the problem to the sight and sound of him. Speech therapist who worked with him over the past year was also evaluated him.

In other tests that can be used to evaluate and diagnose students with autism behavior checklist autism (ABC), Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised (ADI-R), infantile autism Pre-language autism diagnostic observation schedule and (CARS) Rating Scale (is PL - ADOS). These tests, the evaluation unit of autism individual is designed to evaluate the autistic children in particular. In addition, (provided by the parent usually) the child's behavior, the combination of these methods or expert, these tests is dependent on either the historical information about direct observation of the child.

Evaluation of Adam for a three-year evaluation of He was comprehensive and extensive. This evaluation gave the team information at the cognitive level of development of Adam, behavior, communication, health, and coordination. You can use this information, individualized education plan (IEP) team has determined that the arrangement of his was appropriate. International occupational therapy (OT) was recommended. To write several goals, the occupational therapist, to provide services for Adam. Functional analysis concluded that undesirable behavior of Adam has occurred during the transition. Assistive technology assessment revealed that Adam has excelled in this area. Recommendations No, I did not necessary. It was hard work necessary for the IEP team and extensive evaluation of Adam, valuable information would have been provided by the support team in making recommendations for the education of Adam. The evaluation, Adam made it clear that it was making significant progress in the setting of a class of his special day.